Get in touch
Find out about our product lifecycle assessment to maximise product value and minimising energy, waste and carbon impact.
Field engineer networks play a pivotal role in ensuring the smooth operation and maintenance of various infrastructures and systems. However, the environmental impact stemming from the lifecycle management of engineering equipment has become a pressing concern. Companies are aiming to optimise lifecycle management practices to achieve zero waste disposal in the field engineering domain and drive reuse and recycling.
This blog explores the challenges faced when implementing a circular economy within field engineer networks, delving into the strategies and benefits associated with a lifecycle management approach.
Lifecycle management involves the comprehensive oversight of a product or equipment throughout its entire lifespan, from procurement to disposal. It represents an integrated approach to overseeing the entire lifespan of goods and services aimed at promoting sustainable production and consumption practices1.
In the context of field engineer networks, closed-loop Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) encompasses the deployment, maintenance, and eventual retirement or repurposing of engineering equipment and products. Closed-loop PLM focuses on the full lifecycle of a product, from conception to end-of-life. With the transition towards a circular economy, field engineer supply chains must take into consideration their impact on the environment and identify opportunities to create value by reducing, maintaining and recovering product value where possible2.
One of the primary challenges in implementing a circular business model is the reverse logistics and waste management of equipment. Traditional approaches of transferring the majority of waste to landfills, often lead to substantial waste generation, contributing to environmental
degradation3. Disposal of equipment and hazardous materials without proper consideration for its environmental impact results in an increased carbon footprint, pollution, and strain on landfill capacities4.
The cost of passing equipment back through a reverse supply chain must be considered, and the feasibility of value being recovered can help identify the most cost-effective solutions for creating a circular business model5. Reverse logistics can increase operating costs as the transportation, warehousing and processing of returned equipment must be factored in6.
Inventory management of returned equipment must also be considered, the products must be stored until the most effective and appropriate sustainable method of disposal or repurposing can be applied.
The engineer zero-to-landfill initiative and closed-loop PLM advocates for a sustainable model centred around minimising waste generation and maximising resource value.
This involves:
Implementing Product Lifecycle Management and a business model focused on circularity in field engineer networks yields multifaceted benefits:
Transitioning to a closed-loop model requires concerted efforts, including cultural shifts within organisations, investments in technology, industry-wide collaboration and process transformations. Overcoming resistance to change, ensuring compatibility with existing infrastructures, and navigating regulatory landscapes pose ongoing challenges.
However, with growing awareness and advancements in sustainable solutions, the circular economy model holds promise for revolutionising the sustainability of field engineer networks, creating a more environmentally responsible industry. Closed-loop PLM aims to prioritise sustainability, minimise waste generation, and maximise the value of equipment and its components.